کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4483529 | 1316890 | 2011 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
In this study, we investigated the efficiency of dissolved methane (D-CH4) collection by degasification from the effluent of a bench-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating synthetic wastewater. A hollow-fiber degassing membrane module was used for degasification. This module was connected to the liquid outlet of the UASB reactor. After chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency of the UASB reactor became stable, D-CH4 discharged from the UASB reactor was collected. Under 35 °C and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 10 h, average D-CH4 concentration could be reduced from 63 mg COD L−1 to 15 mg COD L−1; this, in turn, resulted in an increase in total methane (CH4) recovery efficiency from 89% to 97%. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of temperature and HRT of the UASB reactor on degasification efficiency. Average D-CH4 concentration was as high as 104 mg COD L−1 at 15 °C because of the higher solubility of CH4 gas in liquid; the average D-CH4 concentration was reduced to 14 mg COD L−1 by degasification. Accordingly, total CH4 recovery efficiency increased from 71% to 97% at 15 °C as a result of degasification. Moreover, degasification tended to cause an increase in particulate COD removal efficiency. The UASB reactor was operated at the same COD loading rate, but different wastewater feed rates and HRTs. Although average D-CH4 concentration in the UASB reactor was almost unchanged (ca. 70 mg COD L−1) regardless of the HRT value, the CH4 discharge rate from the UASB reactor increased because of an increase in the wastewater feed rate. Because the D-CH4 concentration could be reduced down to 12 ± 1 mg COD L−1 by degasification at an HRT of 6.7 h, the CH4 recovery rate was 1.5 times higher under degasification than under normal operation.
Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (80 K)Download as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► Dissolved methane was successfully collected with the degassing membrane.
► Dissolved methane collection efficiencies increased at low temp. or shorter HRT.
► Particulate COD concentration was decreased by degasification.
Journal: Water Research - Volume 45, Issue 11, May 2011, Pages 3533–3540