کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4483854 | 1316901 | 2010 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Medium to small scale point sources continue to threaten river ecosystems through P loadings. The capacity and timescales of within-river processing and P retention are a major factor in how rivers respond to, and protect downstream ecosystems from, elevated concentrations of soluble reactive P (SRP). In this study, the bio-geochemical response of a small river (∼40 km2 catchment area) was determined before, during and after exposure to a fourteen day pulse of treated sewage effluent using an upstream reach as a control. A wide array of approaches (batch and column simulations to in-situ whole stream metabolism) allowed independent comparison and quantification, of the relative contribution of abiotic and biotic processes in-river P cycling. This enabled, for the first time, separating the relative contributions of algae, bacteria and abiotic sorption without the use of labelled P (radioisotope). An SRP mass balance showed that the ecosystem switched from a P sink (during effluent inputs) to a P source (when effluent flow ceased). However, 65–70% of SRP was retained during the exposure time and remained sequestered two-weeks after-effluent flow ceased. Batch studies treated with biocide gave unrealistic results, but P uptake rates derived by other methods were highly comparable. Downstream of the effluent input, net P uptake by algae, bacteria and sediment (including the biofilm polysaccharide matrix) were 0.2 (±0.1), 0.4 (±0.3), and 1.0 (±0.9) mmol m−2 day−1 during effluent exposure. While autotrophic production did not respond to the effluent exposure, heterotrophic production increased by 67% relative to the control and this translated into a 50% increase in biological P uptake rate. Therefore, both biological and abiotic components of stream ecosystems uptake P during exposure to treated sewage effluent P inputs, and maintain a long ‘memory’ of this input in terms of P storage for considerable timescales after loading.
Journal: Water Research - Volume 44, Issue 15, August 2010, Pages 4425–4436