کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5726600 1610090 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Original articleLeadershipDiffering Interpretations of Report Terminology Between Primary Care Physicians and Radiologists
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقاله اصلی دربارۀ تعاریف تفسیر گزارش اصطلاح شناختی بین پزشکان و متخصصان رادیولوژی
کلمات کلیدی
گزارش رادیولوژی، بهبود تمرین، اطلاع رسانی ارجاع پزشکان، اصطلاحات گزارش دهی،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی رادیولوژی و تصویربرداری
چکیده انگلیسی

PurposeThe lexicons of the radiologist and the referring physician may not be synonymous, which could cause confusion with radiology reporting. To further explore this possibility, we surveyed radiologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) regarding their respective interpretations of report terminology.MethodsA survey was distributed to radiologists and PCPs through an internal listserv. Respondents were asked to provide an interpretation of the statistical likelihood of the presence of metastatic disease based upon the terminology used within a hypothetical radiology report. Ten common modifying terms were evaluated. Potential responses for the statistical likelihoods included 0%-25%, 26%-50%, 51%-75%, 76%-99%, and 100%. Differences between the groups were evaluated using either a χ2 test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate.ResultsThe phrases “diagnostic for metastatic disease” and “represents metastatic disease” were selected by a high percentage of both groups as conferring a 100% likelihood of “true metastatic disease.” The phrases “cannot exclude metastatic disease” and “may represent metastatic disease” were selected by a high proportion of both groups as conferring a 0% likelihood of “true metastatic disease.” Radiologists assigned a higher statistical likelihood to the terms “diagnostic for metastatic disease” (P = .016), “represents metastatic disease” (P = .004), “suspicious for metastatic disease” (P = .04), “consistent with metastatic disease” (P < .0001), and “compatible with metastatic disease” (P = .003).ConclusionA qualitative agreement among radiologists and PCPs exists concerning the significance of the evaluated terminology, although radiologists assigned a higher statistical likelihood than PCPs for several phrases.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of the American College of Radiology - Volume 13, Issue 12, Part A, December 2016, Pages 1525-1529.e1
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,