کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5770977 | 1629905 | 2017 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Research papersSediment carbon fate in phreatic karst (Part 2): Numerical model development and application Research papersSediment carbon fate in phreatic karst (Part 2): Numerical model development and application](/preview/png/5770977.png)
- Numerical modeling of sediment carbon fate and transport is carried out for the first time.
- Existing known processes and a previously un-modeled process are simulated.
- Sediment transport capacity is sustained for weeks beyond the surface stream peak.
- 46% of the sediment conveyed within karst is when no surface stream flow exists.
- The equilibrium exchange rate improves modeling and extends our knowledge of karst.
The authors develop a numerical model to elucidate time-distributed processes controlling sediment carbon fate in phreatic karst. Sediment carbon processes simulated in the new numerical model include in-conduit erosion and deposition, sediment carbon transport, surficial fine grained laminae evolution, carbon pool mixing, microbial oxidation, and the understudied process of sediment carbon exchange during equilibrium transport. The authors perform a model evaluation procedure that includes generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation to quantify uncertainty of the model results. Modeling results suggest that phreatic karst conduits sustain sediment transport activity long after surface storm events cease. The sustained sediment transport has the potential to shift the baseflow sediment yield of the phreatic karst to be on par with stormflow sediment yield. The sustained activity is suggested to promote the exchange of sediment carbon between the water column and subsurface karst deposits during equilibrium sediment transport conditions. In turn, the sediment carbon exchange impacts the mixing of new and old carbon pools and the flux of carbon from phreatic karst. Integrated numerical model results from this study support the concept that phreatic karst act as a biologically active conveyor of sediment carbon that temporarily stores sediment, turns over carbon at higher rates than surface streams, and recharges degraded carbon back to the fluvial system. The numerical modeling method adopted in this paper shows the efficacy of coupling carbon isotope fingerprinting with water quality modeling to study sediment carbon in phreatic karst.
Journal: Journal of Hydrology - Volume 549, June 2017, Pages 208-219