Possibilities and limitations of different analytical methods for the size determination of a bimodal dispersion of metallic nanoparticles

Silver nanoparticles (about 70 nm) and gold nanoparticles (about 15 nm) were prepared and colloidally stabilized with poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP). The pure nanoparticles as well as a 1:1 mixture (w:w) were analysed with a variety of methods which probe the size distribution: Scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, analytical disc centrifugation, and Brownian motion analysis (nanoparticle tracking analysis). The differences between the methods are highlighted and their ability to distinguish between silver and gold nanoparticles in the mixture is demonstrated. The size distribution data from the different methods were clearly different, therefore it is recommended to apply more than one method to characterize the nanoparticle dispersion. In particular, the smaller particles were undetectable by dynamic light scattering and nanoparticle tracking analysis in the presence of the large particles. For the 1:1 mixture, only electron microscopy and analytical disc centrifugation were able to give quantitative data on the size distribution. On the other hand, it is not possible to make statements about an agglomeration in dispersion with electron microscopy because an agglomeration may also have occurred during the drying process.

.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideResearch highlights
► Polymer-stabilized silver (70 nm) and gold nanoparticles (15 nm) were prepared.
► The pure metal dispersion as well as a 1:1 mixture were studied by a variety of colloid-chemical methods.
► Besides the average particle diameter, the particle size distribution should be taken into account.
► It is necessary to apply more than one method to obtain meaningful results.
► Small particles may go undetected in the presence of large particles.