Upper-normal waist circumference is a risk marker for metabolic syndrome in normal-weight subjects

- We examined the association between WC and MetS among normal weight subjects.
- The prevalence of MetS gradually increased with increasing WC.
- Prediabetes and borderline dyslipidemia are also prevalent in subjects with upper-normal WC.
- Upper-normal WC represents a risk for acquiring a greater number of MetS components.

Background and aimsTo elucidate implication of upper-normal waist circumference (WC), we examined whether the normal range of WC still represents a risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) or non-adipose MetS components among normal-weight subjects.Methods and resultsA total of 173,510 persons (100,386 men and 73,124 women) with normal WC (<90/80 cm in men/women) and body mass index (BMI) of 18.5-24.9 were included. Subjects were categorized as having low, moderate, and upper-normal WC for those with WC < 80, 80-84, and 85-89 cm in men and <70, 70-74, and 75-79 cm in women, respectively. The prevalence of all the non-adipose MetS components (e.g. prediabetes and borderline dyslipidemia) was significantly higher in subjects with upper-normal WC on comparison with those with low WC. Overall, the prevalence of MetS (having three or more of four non-adipose MetS components) gradually increased with increasing WC (12%, 21%, and 27% in men and 11%, 14%, and 19% in women for low, moderate, and upper-normal WC, respectively). Moreover, the risk of having a greater number of MetS components increased in subjects with upper-normal WC compared with those with low WC (odds ratios for the number of one, two, three, and four MetS components: 1.29, 1.81, 2.53, and 2.47 in men and 1.16, 1.55, 1.49, and 2.20 in women, respectively).ConclusionUpper-normal WC represents a risk for acquiring a greater number of MetS components and the early stage of MetS components (prediabetes and borderline dyslipidemia), after adjusting for BMI, in a large general population with normal WC and BMI.