Original ArticleOptimizations and Nuances in Neurosurgical Technique for the Minimization of Complications in Subdural Electrode Placement for Epilepsy Surgery

BackgroundSurgical intervention is an important therapeutic option for patients with intractable epilepsy and a well-characterized epileptogenic focus. Invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes is an effective technique for localizing epileptogenic foci. Previous studies reported varying complication rates, and these may deter more widespread adoption. We present potentially valuable technical nuances that may be associated with low complication rates. We assess the potential contribution of specific aspects of surgical technique to the reduction of complication rates.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients from the Rush University Surgical Epilepsy database who underwent craniotomies for invasive electroencephalography monitoring for medically intractable epilepsy using our technique. We analyzed and compared complication rates and techniques with those reported elsewhere.ResultsThe sample group comprised 127 consecutive patients who underwent electrode implantation. The average monitoring period was 6 days. There were 5 complications (3.9%), including 1 subdural hematoma requiring surgery (0.8%), 1 infection (0.8%), 2 pulmonary emboli (1.6%), and 1 deep vein thrombosis (0.8%). There were no symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks or permanent neurologic complications. These results compare favorably with published results. Analysis and comparison of our technique anecdotally suggest the importance of use of a subgaleal drain throughout the monitoring period, postoperative antibiotic coverage for 1 week, meticulous hemostasis, and secure suturing of the electrodes to the dura mater to minimize trauma to superficial vessels as potential contributors to improved complication rates.ConclusionsA very low incidence of major morbidity can be achieved in invasive electroencephalography monitoring with this protocol.