Genetic diversity analyses reveal novel recombination events in Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 in China

Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) is the most prevalent causal agent of grapevine leafroll disease (GLD). Of the 75 grapevine samples collected from three regions in China, 46.7% and 94.7% of samples tested positive for GLRaV-3 in reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and reverse transcription nested PCR (RT-nPCR), respectively. The SSCP analysis for the clones of complete CP gene from 16 GLRaV-3 isolates showed that 15 isolates contained one predominant haplotype and one isolate had no predominant haplotype. The sequences of the CP genes showed 89.9-100% identities at the nucleotide level. Phylogenetic analysis of the CP gene sequences revealed the existence of four well defined variant groups, which corresponded to previously reported phylogenetic groups (1, 2, 3, and 5). Two new sub-groups designated as sub-group 1B and sub-group 3B in groups 1 and 3, respectively, were identified in the Chinese GLRaV-3 population. Recombination analyses illustrated that those two new sub-groups (1B and 3B) were emerged as a result of recombination events between variants in groups 1 and 2, and variants in groups 1 and 3, respectively. These results further indicated that the variants in those new sub-groups are viable and evolutionary successful. Recombinants with highly similar coat protein structure to variants of group 1 were abundantly found in the viral population. In addition, these analyses provided evidence about CP gene as one of the recombination hotspots in GLRaV-3 genome. The population genetic parameters of all available CP sequences suggested that the recombinants might have emerged due to population bottlenecks during transmission. The results provide new insights into the variability and evolution of GLRaV-3.

► First study about the genetic diversity of GLRaV-3 populations in China. ► Two new sub-groups of GLRaV-3 were identified. ► Variants in those two sub-groups were recombinants between previously identified groups. ► Most of the recombinants had protein structure similar to variants of group 1. ► Variants in those new sub-groups were viable, replicating and evolutionary successful.