کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6242588 | 1281294 | 2016 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
“What Program Directors Think” III: Results of the 2014/2015 Annual Surveys of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR)
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
رادیولوژی و تصویربرداری
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
PDs believed that the radiology Milestones, now largely implemented, did not affect overall resident evaluation, was not reflective of resident experience, and actually made evaluation of residents more difficult. PDs also felt that although the American Board of Radiology oral examination had been a better test for clinical practice preparedness, their new residents knew at least as much as before. There was little evidence of recall reemergence. The radiology training community saw a drop in residency applicant quality as demonstrated by the United States Medical Licensing Examination scores and clinical rotation grades. Because the new IR/DR Residency positions were to be funded at the expense of the traditional DR positions, the majority of PDs expected a negative effect of the impending IR/DR match on their DR recruitment. PDs were in favor of a unified clinical radiology curriculum similar to the Radiological Society of North America online physics modules.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Academic Radiology - Volume 23, Issue 7, July 2016, Pages 861-869
Journal: Academic Radiology - Volume 23, Issue 7, July 2016, Pages 861-869
نویسندگان
Anna MD, MPH, Darel E. MD, Tan Lucien H. MD, Joyce S. MD, Angelisa M. MD, Stacy E. MD, Jeremy B. MD, Mark MD,