Evaluation of SICAN performance for biofouling mitigation in the food industry

Results show that bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on SICAN and stainless steel were similar, thus surface modification was not able to prevent biological fouling development. However, it was verified that after performing a cleaning protocol with chlorine, reduction of bacterial counts was much higher in SICAN (about 3.3 Log reduction) when compared to stainless steel (1.7 Log reduction). Although full biofilm recovery was observed on both surfaces 18 h after treatment, an operational window was identified for which processes with cleaning intervals of about 6 h could potentially use SICAN surfaces on critical areas (such as dead zones, crevices, corners, joints) and therefore operate at a much higher hygienic level than the one attained with stainless steel.