Radar rainfall estimation for the identification of debris-flow occurrence thresholds

- Radar rainfall estimation for debris flow triggering convective storms is tested.
- Radar signal attenuation in heavy rain is the most important radar error source.
- Large uncertainty affects raingauge based estimation of debris flows rainfall.
- Raingauge-based intensity-duration thresholds are largely underestimated.

SummaryThis work aims to evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of radar rainfall estimates for the identification of debris flow occurrence rainfall thresholds. Observations from a C-band weather radar and raingauge data are analyzed for seven convective rainfall events that triggered 117 debris flows in the Upper Adige river basin (Eastern Italian Alps). Four radar rainfall scenarios characterized by incrementally increasing accuracy are used for the estimation of rainfall intensity-duration thresholds. Error sources considered in the radar correction chain include beam blockage, attenuation and vertical profile of reflectivity. The impact of rainfall accuracy on the estimation of the intensity-duration thresholds is analyzed by comparing the thresholds derived from the various radar rainfall scenarios, using the rainfall estimates obtained from the application of the complete correction algorithm as a reference scenario. Results show that the application of the complete correction algorithm improves significantly the accuracy of radar rainfall estimates: Fractional Standard Error is decreased by 20%, Correlation Coefficient is increased by 24% relative to uncorrected data. Correction for atmospheric attenuation is the most important step in the correction chain. The use of uncorrected radar estimates leads to substantially underestimated thresholds with respect to the reference scenario; adjusting radar data for bias is not sufficient to overcome this problem. Radar rainfall estimates which are corrected but not adjusted with raingauge data are able to provide intensity-duration thresholds which are almost indistinguishable from the reference scenario. The derivation of the radar-based threshold is shown to be very sensitive to spatial location errors of rainfall and debris flows. Raingauge-based thresholds are severely underestimated with respect to the reference scenario. This clearly demonstrates the severity of the raingauge-based estimation problem for the derivation of debris flow triggering rainfall and highlights the benefits of using weather radar observations, at least for the case of short duration convective storms.