The hydrological and economic impacts of changing water allocation in political regions within the peri-urban South Creek catchment in Western Sydney I: Model development

- We model the hydrologic and economic impacts of allocating water.
- This model is unique because it is segregated on political boundaries.
- The region modelled is a place policy makers want to settle a large population.
- The model will (in a companion paper) be used to assess various water saving policies.
- The economic and physical impacts can be viewed jointly by political jurisdiction.

SummaryIn this paper an integrated model of the hydrological and economic impacts of deploying water within the political divisions in the South Creek catchment of the 'peri-urban' region of Western Sydney is presented. This model enables an assessment of the hydrological and economic merits of different water allocation-substitution strategies, both over the whole catchment and in each political region and jurisdiction within it, to be undertaken. Not only are the differences in the water allocated to each region and use revealed, but also the net present values associated with each use within each region. In addition, it is possible to determine measures of equity in water distribution using this approach. It was found that over a period from 2008 to 2031 the South Creek catchment in total would on average use approximately 50,600 ML of potable water a year, the vast majority of this is used in the two urban regions of Penrith and Blacktown. Agricultural water use was also greatest in these two regions. Over this period the allocation system was estimated to have a small net present value of approximately $A301 million and the Benefit-Cost ratio was estimated to be 1.06. The urban regions of Penrith and Blacktown and the rural region of Hawkesbury were estimated to have returned a net positive benefit of $A76 million, $A246 million and $A39 million (respectively), while water to Liverpool and Camden was delivered at a loss of $A7 million and $A52 million over the period assessed. It was found that across the catchment a fair degree of both physical and economic equity occurred between regions, with the exception of Liverpool, which was over endowed with water and paid a high cost for it.