کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
87745 159265 2012 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Loblolly and slash pine control organic carbon in soil aggregates and carbon mineralization
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک بوم شناسی، تکامل، رفتار و سامانه شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Loblolly and slash pine control organic carbon in soil aggregates and carbon mineralization
چکیده انگلیسی

The influence of soil aggregation as a means to protect soil organic carbon (SOC) from mineralization is unclear in very sandy soils. The dominant forest cover types in the Lower Coastal Plain of the US where sandy surface soils prevail are loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii var elliottii). The purpose of this study was to investigate the role that aggregation plays in C incorporation and sequestration in very sandy soils of the Lower Coastal Plain found under loblolly and slash pine ecosystems. Thirteen forest stands (seven loblolly pine; six slash pine) were used for this investigation. A sonic dismembrator was used to apply dispersive energy in order to destroy aggregates. The use of sonic energy was shown to be a valid tool for studying aggregates in sandy soils. The data showed that aggregates do not protect ASOC from mineralization in these very sandy soils. Loblolly pine surface mineral horizons accumulated 131% more TSOC than slash pine soil horizons. Slash pine soils had a 27% higher specific mineralization rate than loblolly pine soils; and Diffuse Reflectance Fourier Transform spectra (DRIFTS) showed that soils under loblolly pine were more aromatic than those under slash pine – and became more aromatic as mineralization proceeded. Due to their dominance in the Lower Coastal Plain of the US, pine ecosystems play an important role in the conversion of atmospheric CO2 into the TSOC pool. However, soil aggregation should not be considered a mechanism to protect SOC in these very sandy soils when modeling soil carbon dynamics, even though slash pine systems show a slightly greater capacity to develop aggregates.


► Soil aggregates do not protect soil organic carbon in sandy soil.
► Loblolly pine soil accumulated more.
► Total/aggregate carbon than slash pine soil.
► Organic carbon in slash pine soil had higher specific.
► Mineralization rates.
► DRIFTS showed more aromatic carbon in loblolly pine soil than in slash pine soil.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Forest Ecology and Management - Volume 263, 1 January 2012, Pages 1–8
نویسندگان
, , , , ,