کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
8924554 | 1643555 | 2017 | 32 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Measures of upper limb function for people with neck pain. AÂ systematic review of measurement and practical properties
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
طب مکمل و جایگزین
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Measures of upper limb function for people with neck pain. AÂ systematic review of measurement and practical properties Measures of upper limb function for people with neck pain. AÂ systematic review of measurement and practical properties](/preview/png/8924554.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
There is a strong relationship between neck pain (NP) and upper limb disability (ULD). Optimal management of NP should incorporate upper limb rehabilitation and therefore include the use of an ULD measure in the assessment and management process. Clear guidance regarding the suitability of available measures does not exist. The aim of this study was to identify all available measures of ULD for populations with NP, critically evaluate their measurement properties and finally recommend a list of suitable measures. This two-phase systematic review is reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Phase one identified clearly reproducible measures of ULD for patients with NP. Phase two identified evidence of their measurement properties. In total, 11 papers evaluating the measurement properties of five instruments were included in this review. The instruments identified were the DASH questionnaire, the QuickDASH questionnaire, the NULI questionnaire, the SFA and the SAMP test. There was limited positive evidence of validity of the DASH, QuickDASH, NULI, SFA and SAMP. There was limited positive evidence of reliability of the NULI, SFA and SAMP. There was unknown evidence of responsiveness of the DASH and QuickDASH. Although all measures are supported by a limited amount of low quality evidence, the DASH, QuickDASH, NULI questionnaires, and the SAMP test are promising measures, but they require further robust evaluation.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Musculoskeletal Science and Practice - Volume 29, June 2017, Pages 155-163
Journal: Musculoskeletal Science and Practice - Volume 29, June 2017, Pages 155-163
نویسندگان
Ahmad Salah Eldin Alreni, Deborah Harrop, Anna Lowe, Tanzila Potia Tanzila Potia, Karen Kilner, Sionnadh Mairi McLean,