When destiny hurts: Implicit theories of relationships moderate aggressive responses to ostracism

The current research investigates the role of implicit theories of relationships in modulating aggressive responses to ostracism. Three studies tested whether destiny beliefs (that potential relationships are either fundamentally compatible or not) predispose people to behave aggressively in the wake of ostracism. In Study 1, individual differences in destiny beliefs moderated the relationship between ostracism and aggressive affect. Two additional studies showed that manipulated destiny beliefs (vs. growth beliefs) caused ostracized participants to blast a provocateur with aversive noise (Study 2) and to give a destructive job candidate evaluation to a stranger (Study 3). These results highlight the significance of implicit theories in understanding risk factors for ostracism-related aggression.

► Implicit theories of relationships moderate the association between ostracism and aggression.
► Individuals high in destiny beliefs are more aggressive when they are ostracized compared to those low in destiny beliefs.
► People primed with destiny beliefs respond more aggressively to ostracism than those primed with growth beliefs.