کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
948262 | 926459 | 2012 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

We hypothesize that while evaluative priming involves proprioceptive cues, the IAT is representational due to its structural features and the specific algorithm upon which the IAT-effect rests. As predicted, evaluative priming is shown to rely on differential facial muscle activity while the IAT as a measurement instrument is not influenced by proprioceptive information. Evaluative priming does not yield differential responsiveness for congruent and incongruent trials when facial muscle activity is inhibited whereas the IAT-effect is shown to be impervious to such inhibition. Implications for the underlying mechanisms of implicit measures are discussed.
► We explore two implicit measures of attitudes toward social groups.
► We compare evaluative priming and implicit attitude test with an embodied perspective.
► Evaluative priming relies on differential facial muscle activity: Proprioceptive cues.
► Implicit attitude test is not influenced by proprioceptive information.
► These two measures assess different aspects of the attitudes toward social groups.
Journal: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology - Volume 48, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 424–427