|کد مقاله||کد نشریه||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||نسخه تمام متن|
|100715||1422279||2015||7 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||دانلود کنید|
The current study investigated the efficacy of inoculation as a trial strategy designed to counter mock jurors' perceptions that an expert is a hired gun in a criminal trial. The effect of narrative and fragmented expert responses to cross-examination questions was also examined. The significant results were that not using inoculation led to higher ratings of expert knowledge compared to other conditions. Response style did not make a difference in the criminal setting. Implications of these results regarding “hired gun” expert witnesses and courtroom persuasion are discussed.
Journal: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry - Volumes 42–43, September–December 2015, Pages 91–97