کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
100946 | 1422294 | 2012 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Do forensic practitioners distinguish between testifying and consulting experts? A pilot study
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
پزشکی قانونی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
Forensic mental health professionals (n = 44) reviewed a series of statements that an attorney might make to a consulting or testifying expert. Each statement was rated for its degree of appropriateness to either the consulting or the testifying role. In light of increasing attention paid to this topic in the forensic practice literature, as well as long-standing distinctions recognized by the legal profession, it was originally hypothesized that participants would differentiate clearly between these roles; however, results of this pilot study indicate that forensic practitioners do not possess a consistent sense of which activities rest most comfortably within testimonial as opposed to consulting duties.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry - Volume 35, Issues 5–6, September–December 2012, Pages 452–455
Journal: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry - Volume 35, Issues 5–6, September–December 2012, Pages 452–455
نویسندگان
Thomas Gordon Gutheil, Michael Lamport Commons, Eric Y. Drogin, Mark J. Hauser, Patrice Marie Miller, Andrew Michael Richardson,