Fracture toughness of cross-linked and non-cross-linked temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials

ObjectivesTemporary crowns and fixed partial dentures are exposed to considerable functional loading, which places severe demands on the biomaterials used for their fabrication (= temporary crown & bridge materials, t-c&b). As the longevity of biopolymers is influenced by the ability to withstand a crack propagation, the aim of this study was to investigate the fracture toughness of cross-linked and non-cross-linked t-c&bs.MethodsFour different t-c&bs (Luxatemp AM Plus, Protemp 3 Garant, Structur Premium, Trim) were used to fabricate bar shaped specimens (2 mm × 5 mm × 25 mm, ISO 13586). A notch (depth 2.47 mm) was placed in the center of the specimen using a diamond cutting disc and a sharp pre-crack was added using a razor blade. 60 specimens per material were subjected to different storage conditions (dry and water 37 °C: 30 min, 60 min, 4 h, 24 h, 168 h; thermocycling 5–55 °C: 168 h) prior to fracture (3-point bending setup). The fracture sites were inspected using SEM analysis. Data was subjected to parametric statistics (p = 0.05).ResultsThe KIC values varied between 0.4 and 1.3 MPa m0.5 depending on the material and storage time. Highest KIC were observed for Protemp 3 Garant. Fracture toughness was significantly affected by thermocycling for all dimethacrylates (p < 0.05) except for Structur Premium. All dimethacrylates showed a linear-elastic fracture mechanism, whereas the monomethacrylate showed an elasto-plastic fracture mechanism.SignificanceDimethacrylates exhibit a low resistance against crack propagation immediately after curing. In contrast, monomethacrylates may compensate for crack propagation due to plastic deformation. However, KIC is compromised with increasing storage time.