کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1423025 986475 2008 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
In vitro cytotoxic response to lithium disilicate dental ceramics
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی مواد بیومتریال
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
In vitro cytotoxic response to lithium disilicate dental ceramics
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectivesThe use of lithium disilicate dental ceramics is increasing in dentistry and previous reports have suggested that they may have greater biological risks than previously thought. We tested a hypothesis that composition and processing influence the biological properties of these ceramics.MethodsThe cytotoxicity of two machined and three pressed lithium disilicate materials (n = 6) were tested in vitro using mouse fibroblasts in direct contact with the materials for 72 h. Cellular response was estimated by mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase activity (MTT method). Mitochondrial activity was expressed as a percentage of Teflon® controls, then compared to Teflon® using 2-sided t-tests (α = 0.05). Polished materials were aged in artificial saliva and tested for cytotoxicity periodically over 6 weeks, then were repolished (320 grit SiC paper), aged and tested again for 4 weeks.ResultsAll materials significantly (50–70%) suppressed cellular mitochondrial activity in the initial week, but suppression decreased by 25–30% over the next 2 weeks. In weeks 4 and 6 some materials exhibited a cytotoxic ‘relapse’ of 10–20%. The cytotoxic response was no different for machined or pressed materials, but the presence of ZnO had at least an association with longer-term cytotoxicity and relapse. Repolishing to 320 grit did not increase cytotoxicity significantly.SignificanceOur results suggest that lithium disilicates are not biologically inert, and that many have a similar cytotoxicity dynamic regardless of small differences in composition or processing.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Dental Materials - Volume 24, Issue 4, April 2008, Pages 450–456
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,