کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4184323 1277305 2014 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Initial evidence for sex-specific effects of early emotional abuse on affective processing in bipolar disorder
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
شواهد اولیه اثرات متفاوتی از سوء مصرف عواطف اولیه در درمان عاطفی در اختلال دوقطبی
کلمات کلیدی
تروما کودکی، پردازش مؤثر، اختلال دو قطبی، آزمون تیزهوشان آیووا، عاطفی برو / بدون برو
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی روانپزشکی و بهداشت روانی
چکیده انگلیسی

PurposeThis study investigates the effect of sex and childhood trauma on affective processing in bipolar disorder (BPD) patients.MethodsIn a sample of fifty-six BPD patients, we administered the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Affective Go/No-Go (AGNG) to measure affective processing. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the effect of sex and childhood trauma on IGT; Repeated-Measures ANOVAs to measure accuracy and bias measures across conditions on the AGNG.ResultsIn the context of childhood abuse, females evidenced a more conservative cognitive style than males by selecting fewer cards from the disadvantageous decks [F(1, 49) = 14.218; P < 0.001] and showed an improvement throughout the task, as noted in a normal learning curve [F(1.49) = 4.385; P = 0.041)]. For the AGNG, an interaction specific to the negative valence stimuli on response bias measures was found. Abused females scored higher (mean = 8.38; SD = 6.39) than abused males (mean = 0.69; SD = 1.19) [F(1.46) = 6.348; P = 0.015].ConclusionSeverity of childhood trauma was significantly different between sexes. In the context of a history of emotional abuse, male bipolar patients tended toward a more risk-taking behavior compared to female. Further investigations are needed to elucidate potential pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this interaction.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: European Psychiatry - Volume 29, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages 52–57
نویسندگان
, , , , ,