کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4483743 | 1623124 | 2008 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Influence of mixed liquor recycle ratio and dissolved oxygen on performance of pre-denitrification submerged membrane bioreactors Influence of mixed liquor recycle ratio and dissolved oxygen on performance of pre-denitrification submerged membrane bioreactors](/preview/png/4483743.png)
The conflicting influence of mixed liquor recycle ratio and dissolved oxygen on nitrogen removal and membrane fouling of a pre-denitrification submerged MBR was investigated in this study. It was found that a high aeration rate of 10 L air/min was able to minimize membrane fouling as compared with lower aeration rates of 5 and 2.5 L air/min in this study. Faster fouling at lower aeration rate was due to the decrease in cross-flow velocity across the membrane surface. However, high DO concentration (average of 5.1±0.5 mg O2/L) present in the recycle mixed liquor at an aeration rate of 10 L air/min deteriorated the TN removal efficiency when operating at a recycle ratio of more than 3. A lower aeration rate of 5 L air/min, resulting in an average DO concentration of 3.4±0.7 mg O2/L in the recycle mixed liquor, led to an improvement in TN removal efficiency: 63%, 80%, 84% and 89% for mixed liquor recycle ratio of 1, 3, 5 and 10, respectively. Further decrease in aeration rate to 2.5 L air/min, resulting in an average DO concentration of 1.9±0.8 mg O2/L, did not improve the TN removal efficiency. Using a newly developed simplified nitrification–denitrification model, it was calculated that the COD/NO3−-N required for denitrification at 10 L air/min aeration rate was higher than those associated with 5 and 2.5 L air/min aeration rates. The model also revealed that denitrification at an aeration rate of 10 L air/min was limited by COD concentration present in the wastewater when operating at a mixed liquor recycle ratio of 3 and higher.
Journal: Water Research - Volume 42, Issues 4–5, February 2008, Pages 1122–1132