کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4640457 | 1341275 | 2011 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Pressure–volume–temperature (P–V–T)(P–V–T) data are required in simulating chemical plants because the latter usually involve production, separation, transportation, and storage of fluids. In the absence of actual experimental data, the pertinent mathematical model must rely on phase behaviour prediction by the so-called equations of state (EOS). When the plant model is a combination of differential and algebraic equations, simulation generally relies on numerical integration which proceeds in a piecewise fashion unless an approximate solution is needed at a single point. Needless to say, the constituent algebraic equations must be efficiently re-solved before each update of derivatives. Now, Ostrowski’s fourth-order iterative technique is a partial substitution variant of Newton’s popular second-order method. Although simple and powerful, this two-point variant has been utilised very little since its publication over forty years ago. After a brief introduction to cubic equations of state and their solution, this paper solves five of them. The results clearly demonstrate the superiority of Ostrowski’s method over Newton’s, Halley’s, and Chebyshev’s solvers.
Journal: Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics - Volume 235, Issue 16, 15 June 2011, Pages 4736–4741