Paleomagnetism of the Siberian traps: New data and a new overall 250 Ma pole for Siberia

The flood basalt province in Siberia is one of the largest in the world but the number of reliable paleomagnetic data on these volcanics is still limited. We studied lava flows and trap-related intrusions from two areas in the north and west of the Siberian platform. A dual-polarity characteristic component was isolated from most samples with the aid of stepwise thermal and alternating field demagnetization. We then compiled all published paleomagnetic data on the Siberian traps that have been obtained according to modern standards; also included are presumably trap-related overprint directions in Paleozoic rocks. Although these overprints and trap results may locally differ, the corresponding mean poles based on remagnetized sediments and volcanics show excellent overall agreement and justify pooling of both data types. Several ways of data grouping were attempted; the trap mean pole proved to be rather insensitive to statistical treatment. Irrespective of the averaging procedure used, the overall mean poles for the Siberian traps (NSP2: 55.1°N, 147.0°E; N = 8, K = 123, A95 = 5.0° or NSP4: 57.2°N, 151.1°E; N = 8, K = 192, A95 = 4.0°) differ slightly, but significantly from the coeval mean poles of Baltica [Torsvik, 2001; Van der Voo, R., and Torsvik, T.H., The quality of the European Permo-Triassic paleopoles and its impact on Pangea reconstructions, in: Timescales of the Paleomagnetic Field, J. E. T. Channell, D.V. Kent, W. Lowrie, and J.G. Meert, eds., AGU Geophys. Monogr., 2004, 135, 29–42]. We consider possible causes for this difference and conclude that it could be explained either by persistent non-dipole terms in the Permo-Triassic geomagnetic field or widespread inclination shallowing in the European data.