کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4728786 1640209 2014 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Petrography and geochemistry of Ga’ara sedimentary ironstones, Western Desert of Iraq
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
پتروگرافی و ژئوشیمی سنگ آهن رسوبی، بیابان غربی عراق
کلمات کلیدی
سنگ آهن پیزولیتی، رسوبی، ژئوشیمی، پتروگرافی، منطقه گاارا
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات زمین شناسی
چکیده انگلیسی


• The ironstones of Ga’ara are of two types, massive and pisolitic–oolitic.
• Most of pisolitic type is restricted to the southern rim of Ga’ara Depression.
• The massive type occurs in sandstones, the pisolitic type in claystones.
• The iron was mostly transported in colloidal solution and as heavy minerals.
• The iron was deposited on the clay particles and as cementing material.

The ironstone lenses of Ga’ara area are enclosed within the uppermost part of the clastic succession of Permocarboniferous Ga’ara Formation. This succession is composed mainly of sandstones (sometimes with pebbles), siltstones, and kaolinitic claystones. The ironstones are classified according to their lithology and texture into two types: massive and pisolitic–oolitic ironstones. The later is restricted to the southern rim of Ga’ara Depression. The enclosure of ironstone lenses within the fining upward cycle, predominance of colloform and pisolitic oolitic textures and the low Cu, Pb, Zn, and Mn contents are good evidences for the shallow sedimentary environment of deposition. There is no convincing evidence to suggest any serious role of lateritization process in the formation of the studied ironstones. The most probable source rocks that consist of plutonic metamorphic complexes of Arabian Shield were subjected to deep chemical weathering and erosion under humid and tropical climate. These products dominated by amorphous iron oxyhydroxides, kaolinite, and quartz were transported by rivers to be deposited in fluviatile and lacustrine environments in Ga’ara area. Iron was carried as colloids and/or associated with clay fractions. The massive clayey ironstone and pisolitic oolitic ironstone were formed by the deposition of iron oxyhydroxide-bearing clays within small lakes associated with flood plain river overbanks; while the massive sandy ironstone was formed by the deposition of water laid detrital quartz grains cemented by goethite and hematite.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of African Earth Sciences - Volume 97, September 2014, Pages 261–272
نویسندگان
, , ,