Computational reproducibility of “Goal relevance and goal conduciveness appraisals lead to differential autonomic reactivity in emotional responding to performance feedback” (Kreibig, Gendolla, & Scherer, 2012): A guide and new evidence

- I tested the computational reproducibility of Kreibig, Gendolla, & Scherer (2012).
- I provide material to make the study reproducible via the Open Science Framework.
- I provide a road map of best practices to facilitate computational reproducibility.
- Emotional responding to performance feedback has motivational effects.
- Greater relevance amplifies emotion to conducive but not obstructive events.

The emerging field of the psychophysiology of motivation bears many new findings, but little replication. Using my own data (Kreibig, Gendolla, & Scherer, 2012), I test the reproducibility of this specific study, provide the necessary materials to make the study reproducible, and instantiate proper reproducibility practices that other researchers can use as a road map toward the same goal. In addition, based on re-analyses of the original data, I report new evidence for the motivational effects of emotional responding to performance feedback. Specifically, greater appraisal of goal relevance amplifies the emotional response to events appraised as conducive (i.e., effort mobilization), but not to those appraised as obstructive to a person's goals (i.e., effort withdrawal). I conclude by providing a ten-step road map of best practices to facilitate computational reproducibility for future studies.