کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5433183 | 1398056 | 2016 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectiveBleaching (alias whitening) is increasingly the chosen means of modifying the appearance of teeth for cosmetic reasons. Behbehani et al. (2012) acquired the largest known data set for the effects of bleaching over time (300 patients for â¼1 year), but the analysis then was rather superficial and did not exploit the full depth of information available in it.MethodsData collected by Behbehani et al. (2012) were re-analysed to explore in detail the variation in outcome between patients and over time.ResultsThere is a distinct regression in shade scale value with time, taking something over 1 year to approach stability. There appears to be an intrinsic shade that cannot be altered, at around 1 unit (0.5M1 on the Vita 3D bleached shade guide). Some patients (11/300 at 1 year) appear to be worse-off after treatment, especially those with lighter starting shades, while many get no real benefit, with a change â¤2 units.SignificanceThe effects of bleaching are often transient, but the reversion to a darker shade than the original may be due to the cumulative damage done to the organic matrix of enamel. The ethics of the treatment are questioned, as are over-the-counter products and whitening toothpastes. It might be appropriate to suggest to a patient that there is no point unless the shade is darker than some (Vita) shade value, say â¼1M2, but in any case informed consent is in need of improvement. All observations of the effects of bleaching ought to be made on timescales longer than 1 year to be meaningful.
Journal: Dental Materials - Volume 32, Issue 10, October 2016, Pages 1281-1288