کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5538222 | 1552015 | 2017 | 15 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- Over the four years crop yields were never increased by biochar.
- In the first months biochar caused manganese deficiency in maize.
- Biochar increased nitrate retention in the topsoil 0-15Â cm where it was incorporated.
- Biochar could not alleviate N uptake limitation under drought conditions.
- The same soil and biochar produced different results in a greenhouse compared to the field study.
The use of biochar (BC) is discussed as a strategy to sequester carbon in soils, to reduce GHG emissions and improve soil fertility. However, the responses of crop yields to biochar amendments in agricultural ecosystems, specifically under temperate field conditions, are still uncertain. Furthermore, results obtained under field conditions are often differing from laboratory studies. Therefore, the establishment of long-term studies under field conditions is mandatory to provide the base for recommendations. We carried out a two-factorial split-plot field experiment over four years (2012-2015, still in progress) to compare the effects of BC on crop yields, mineral nitrogen (NO3â and NH4+) dynamics, soil moisture and initial soil CO2 efflux. A temperate sandy soil was amended with BC (0, 15 and 30 Mg haâ1) with the second factor being watering regime (irrigated or rainfed). The soil CO2 efflux was increased only for a short time following BC amendments. Freshly incorporated BC (30 Mg haâ1) initially induced manganese (Mn) deficiency at the vegetative stage of the first crop maize (Zea maize L.). Biochar amendments significantly reduced NO3â leaching, as indicated by greater NO3â stocks in the topsoil and reduced stocks in the subsoil (0-15, BC amendment zone and 60-90 cm respectively). In BC treatments a higher soil moisture and higher NO3â amount was observed, however, this did not translate into higher yields. Rather, grain yields of maize (year I) and summer barley (Hordeum vulgare L., year III, no nitrogen (N) fertilization) were significantly reduced (1-11 and 5-26% respectively) due to N deficiency with BC amendment or (non-alleviated) drought stress. A prolonged drought spell in 2015 (year IV) drastically reduced the grain yield of maize (5 and 0.7 Mg haâ1) and N uptake (96 and 11 kg haâ1) in the irrigated and rainfed treatments respectively, without any alleviating effects of biochar amendment. We conclude that application of large amounts of pure, non-nutrient-loaded biochar to temperate sandy soils may provide environmental benefits, such as carbon sequestration and reduction of nitrate leaching, but without an economic incentive for implementing biochar use, at least for the initial few years of application.
Journal: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment - Volume 237, 16 January 2017, Pages 80-94