کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5642621 | 1586246 | 2017 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- The classification of mandibular osteoradionecrosis is vague and inconsistent, even in clinical trials.
- Here, we explore the definitions of ORN using the blinded clinical outcomes of the HOPON trial.
- Minor bone spicules (MBS) <20Â mm2 are a common outcome, occurring in around 20% of patients in the trial.
- Some investigators will report MBS as ORN but others feel this is clinically less important, leading to potential ambiguity.
- MBS is worthy of a separate classification in trials addressing the management of ORN.
IntroductionMandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a common and serious complication of head and neck radiotherapy for which there is little reliable evidence for prevention or treatment. The diagnosis and classification of ORN have been inconsistently and imprecisely defined, even in clinical trials.MethodsA systematic review of diagnosis and classifications of ORN with specific focus on clinical trials is presented. The most suitable classification was evaluated for consistency using blinded independent review of outcome data (clinical photographs and radiographs) in the HOPON trial.ResultsOf 16 ORN classifications found, only one (Notani) appeared suitable as an endpoint in clinical trials. Clinical records of 217 timepoints were analysed amongst 94 randomised patients in the HOPON trial. The only inconsistency in classification arose where minor bone spicules (MBS) were apparent, which occurred in 19% of patients. Some trial investigators judged MBS as clinically unimportant and not reflecting ORN, others classified as ORN based on rigid definitions in common clinical use. When MBS was added as a distinct category to the Notani classification this ambiguity was resolved and agreement between observers was achieved.DiscussionMost definitions and clinical classifications are based on retrospective case series and may be unsuitable for prospective interventional trials of ORN prevention or treatment. When ORN is used as a primary or secondary outcome in prospective clinical trials, the use of Notani classification with the additional category of MBS is recommended as it avoids subjectivity and enhances reliability and consistency of reporting.
Journal: Oral Oncology - Volume 64, January 2017, Pages 73-77