Full length articleLate Devonian-early Permian subduction-accretion of the Zharma-Saur oceanic arc, West Junggar (NW China): Insights from field geology, geochemistry and geochronology

- Tarbagatay accretionary complex intruded by late Paleozoic arc magma.
- Migration of Zharma-Saur arc caused by growth of accretionary complex and retreat of trench.
- 383-262 Ma continuously southward migration of Zharma-Saur arc magma.
- New insight for magmatism migration and new evidence for resolving evolutionary controversies of CAOB.

Migration of arc magmatism is of significant importance for accretionary orogens, but few examples have been documented in ancient orogens. In this paper we report late Paleozoic-early Permian, migrating magmatism of the intra-oceanic Zharma-Saur arc in the Tarbagatay Mountains, West Junggar, NW China, in order to address the general role of a growing arc in accretionary orogenesis, and the debates on the formation and timing of the Kazakhstan orocline in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB). Our detailed field work suggests that in the Zharma-Saur arc plutons and dikes intruded and lavas erupted in association with accretionary complexes that were dominated by ocean plate stratigraphy (OPS). Mafic to intermediate magmas have arc-type geochemical signatures such as depleted HFSEs and enrichments in LILEs and LREEs, coupled with high εNd(t) (+5.7 to +6.8) to low 87Sr/86Sr initial values (+0.7035 to +0.7037). The Tarbagatay accreted rocks contain early Paleozoic pillow lavas, which have depleted LILEs, high εNd(t) (+7.4 to +8.2) and high 87Sr/86Sr initial values (+0.7041 to +0.7063). These data suggest that the Zharma-Saur arc was an intra-oceanic island arc that developed on accreted OPS material. U-Pb zircon isotopic data (the ZWTB I diorite pluton, 322 ± 3 Ma; the JLDK diorite pluton, 318 ± 4 Ma; andesitic lavas, 312 ± 2 Ma, 310 ± 4 Ma, 301 ± 3 Ma) demonstrate that the Zharma-Saur arc magmatism occurred in the late Paleozoic. Integration with published geochronological data on the Zharma-Saur arc leads to a complex model of arc growth with a general southward younging of the arc magmatism from 383 Ma to 262 Ma. These relations imply a southward growth and migration of the magmatic axis of the Zharma-Saur arc that was associated with a short period of ridge subduction. The magmatic activity of the Zharma-Saur arc that probably continued until the early Permian resulted from migrations towards the forearc and backarc, as well as oblique or parallel motion to the trench. These new results not only provide robust evidence for resolving controversies about the Phanerozoic accretionary and continental growth of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, but also shed light on the migration of magmatism in accretionary orogens in general.

157