Seabed texture and composition changes offshore of Port Royal Sound, South Carolina before and after the dredging for beach nourishment

- Most sediments are fine sand with <2% organic matter content.
- Sediments are well sorted and nearly symmetrical in skewness.
- Very little mud accumulation was found in the borrow site for beach nourishment.
- Major impacts from dredging are on grain size and carbonate content.

Beach nourishment has been a strategy widely used to slow down coastal erosion in many beaches around the world. The dredging of sand at the borrow site, however, can have complicated physical, geological and ecological impacts. Our current knowledge is insufficient to make accurate predictions of sediment infilling in many dredging pits due to lack of detailed sediment data. Two sites in the sandy shoal southeast of Port Royal Sound (PRS) of South Carolina, USA, were sampled 8 times from April 2010 to March 2013; one site (defined as 'borrow site') was 2 km offshore and used as the dredging site for beach nourishment of nearby Hilton Head Island in Beaufort County, South Carolina, and the other site (defined as 'reference site') was 10 km offshore and not directly impacted by the dredging. A total of 184 surficial sediment samples were collected randomly at two sites during 8 sampling periods. Most sediments were fine sand, with an average grain size of 2.3 phi and an organic matter content less than 2%. After the dredging in December 2011-January 2012, sediments at the borrow site became finer, changing from 1.0 phi to 2.3 phi, and carbonate content decreased from 10% to 4%; changes in mud content and organic matter were small. Compared with the reference site, the borrow site experienced larger variations in mud and carbonate content. An additional 228 sub-samples were gathered from small cores collected at 5 fixed stations in the borrow site and 1 fixed station at the reference site 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the dredging; these down-core sub-samples were divided into 1-cm slices and analyzed using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer. Most cores were uniform vertically and consisted of fine sand with well to moderately well sorting and nearly symmetrical averaged skewness. Based on the analysis of grain size populations, 2 phi- and 3 phi-sized sediments were the most dynamic sand fractions in PRS. Mud deposition on shoals offshore of PRS presumably happens when offshore mud transport is prevalent and there is a following rapid sand accumulation to bury the mud. However, in this borrow site there was very little accumulation of mud. This will allow the site to be used in future nourishment projects presuming no accumulation of mud occurs in the future.