کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6554729 | 1422313 | 2009 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Psychologists abandon the Nuremberg ethic: Concerns for detainee interrogations
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
پزشکی قانونی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Psychologists abandon the Nuremberg ethic: Concerns for detainee interrogations Psychologists abandon the Nuremberg ethic: Concerns for detainee interrogations](/preview/png/6554729.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
In the aftermath of 9-11, the American Psychological Association, one of the largest U.S. health professions, changed its ethics code so that it now runs counter to the Nuremberg Ethic. This historic post-9-11 change allows psychologists to set aside their ethical responsibilities whenever they are in irreconcilable conflict with military orders, governmental regulations, national and local laws, and other forms of governing legal authority. This article discusses the history, wording, rationale, and implications of the ethical standard that U.S. psychologists adopted 7 years ago, particularly in light of concerns over health care professionals' involvement in detainee interrogations and the controversy over psychologists' prominent involvement in settings like the Guantánamo Bay Detainment Camp and the Abu Ghraib prison. It discusses possible approaches to the complex dilemmas arising when ethical responsibilities conflict with laws, regulations, or other governing legal authority.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry - Volume 32, Issue 3, MayâJune 2009, Pages 161-166
Journal: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry - Volume 32, Issue 3, MayâJune 2009, Pages 161-166
نویسندگان
Kenneth S. Pope, Thomas G. Gutheil,