کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
7332785 1476035 2015 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison communities in a cluster randomised trial innovate in response to 'being controlled'
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
جوامع مقایسه در یک آزمایش تصادفی خوشه ای در پاسخ به "کنترل"
کلمات کلیدی
محاکمه خوشه ای تصادفی نظریه مداخله، گروه مقایسه تحقیق کیفی، مقیاس افسردگی پس از زایمان ادینبورگ، بهبود کیفیت، آلودگی،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
چکیده انگلیسی
We conducted qualitative interviews among primary health care teams and community agencies in eight communities in Victoria, Australia which had (1) agreed to be part of a universal primary care and community development intervention to reduce post natal depression and promote maternal health; and (2) were randomised to the comparison arm. The purpose was to document their experience with and interpretation of the trial. Although 'control' in a controlled trial refers to the control of confounding of the trial result by factors other than allocation to the intervention, participants interpreted 'control' to mean restrictions on what they were allowed to do during the trial period. They had agreed not to use the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale or the SF 36 in clinical practice and not to implement any of the elements of the intervention. We found that no elements of the intervention were implemented. However, the extension of the trial from three to five years made the trial agreement a strain. The imposition of trial conditions also encouraged a degree of lateral thinking and innovation in service delivery (quality improvement). This may have potentially contributed to the null trial results. The observations invite interrogation of intervention theory and consequent rethinking of the way contamination in a cluster trial is defined.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Social Science & Medicine - Volume 133, May 2015, Pages 102-110
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,