Performance of high mach number scramjets - Tunnel vs flight

While typically analysed through ground-based impulse facilities, scramjets experience significant heating loads in flight, raising engine wall temperatures and the fuel used to cool them beyond standard laboratory conditions. Hence, the present work numerically compares an access-to-space scramjet's performance at both these conditions. The Mach 12 Rectangular-to-Elliptical Shape-Transitioning scramjet flow path is examined via three-dimensional and chemically reacting Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solutions. Flight operation is modelled through 800 K and 1800 K inlet and combustor walls respectively, while fuel is injected at both inlet- and combustor-based stations at 1000 K stagnation temperature. Room temperature walls and fuel plena model shock tunnel conditions. Mixing and combustion performance indicates that while flight conditions promote rapid mixing, high combustor temperatures inhibit the completion of reaction pathways, with reactant dissociation reducing chemical heat release by 16%. However, the heated walls in flight ensured 28% less energy was absorbed by the walls. While inlet fuel injection promotes robust burning of combustor-injected fuel, premature ignition upon the inlet in flight suggests these injectors should be moved further downstream. Coupled with counteracting differences in heat release and loss to the walls, the optimal engine design for flight may differ considerably from that which gives the best performance in the tunnel.