کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
8491587 | 1552388 | 2014 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Importance of yeast viability for reducing the effects of ruminal acidosis in beef heifers during and following an imposed acidosis challenge
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اهمیت زنده ماندن مخمر برای کاهش اثرات اسیدوز شفاف در تلیسه های گوشتی در طی و پس از چالش اسیدوز اعمال شده
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
ADFdirect fed microbialNH3–NDMIADYCFUVFAMGAaNDFDFMTMRAUC - AUCAmmonia Nitrogen - آمونیاک نیتروژنVolatile fatty acids - اسیدهای چرب فرارAcidosis - اسیدوزacid detergent fiber expressed inclusive of residual ash - الیاف پاک کننده اسید بیانگر شامل خاکستر باقی مانده استViability - زنده ماندنSARA - ساراLactate - لاکتاتdry matter - ماده خشکYeast - مخمرActive dried yeast - مخمر خشک فعالdry matter intake - مصرف ماده خشکarea under curve - منطقه تحت منحنیcrude protein - پروتئین خامtotal mixed ration - کل جیره مخلوط شدهcolony forming unit - کلنی واحد تشکیلBeef - گوشت گاو
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک
علوم دامی و جانورشناسی
چکیده انگلیسی
The study was aimed at determining the importance of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) viability for reducing the severity of ruminal acidosis in cattle during and following an imposed acidosis challenge. Six ruminally cannulated beef heifers were used in a replicated 3Â ÃÂ 3 Latin square design and fed a diet consisting of 400Â g/kg barley silage, 100Â g/kg chopped grass hay, and 500Â g/kg barley grain based concentrate (dry matter basis). Treatments were: (1) control (no yeast); (2) active dried yeast (ADY; 4Â g providing 1010 colony forming units/g; AB Vista, UK); and (3) killed dried yeast (KDY; 4Â g autoclaved ADY). The periods consisted of 2 weeks of adaptation (day 1-14), week 3 of baseline measurements (day 15-21) and week 4 of acidosis challenge (day 22-28). The challenge model involved restricting consumption of the TMR to 0.5 of ad libitum intake for 24Â h (day â1; prechallenge) followed by adding barley grain (amount equivalent to 0.25 of DMI) directly to the rumen prior to feeding the TMR (day 0; challenge day). Data were collected from 0 to 24Â h on the challenge day, 25-48Â h post grain challenge (day 1 postchallenge) and during a 5-day recovery period. No treatment effects were observed on mean (P=0.40), nadir (P=0.37) and maximum (P=0.29) ruminal pH on the challenge day. Similarly, no treatment differences were observed for ruminal lactate (P=0.46) and total VFA concentrations (P=0.15) on the challenge day. However, proportion of ruminal propionate was increased (P=0.01) while caproate reduced (P=0.01) with ADY. The duration of time that pHÂ <Â 5.8 (P=0.26) and 5.6 (P=0.32) was similar for all treatments. No treatment effects were observed on DMI on the challenge day (P=0.95); and day 1 postchallenge (P=0.30). In conclusion, contrary to our hypothesis, yeast supplementation did not influence ruminal pH during a severe acidosis challenge as the efficacy of both viable and killed yeast was reduced at low ruminal pH. Lack of significant effects observed in the present study might also be due to variability associated with the animal responses to an acute acidosis challenge.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Animal Feed Science and Technology - Volume 197, November 2014, Pages 103-113
Journal: Animal Feed Science and Technology - Volume 197, November 2014, Pages 103-113
نویسندگان
D. Vyas, A. Uwizeye, W.Z. Yang, K.A. Beauchemin,