کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
8723161 1208240 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of Bone Mineral Density by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Bone Strength by Speed-of-Sound Ultrasonography in Adults With Gaucher Disease
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه تراکم معدنی استخوان با جذب سنجی اشعه ایکس دوگانه انرژی و قدرت استخوانی با استفاده از روش اولتراسونوگرافی با سرعت بالا در افراد مبتلا به بیماری گوچر
کلمات کلیدی
یک نوع بیماری است که خون به استخوان نمیرسد، استخوان فاقد خون، تراکم معدنی استخوان، جذب سنجی اشعه ایکس دوگانه انرژی، بیماری گوچه، سونوگرافی سریع صدا
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی غدد درون ریز، دیابت و متابولیسم
چکیده انگلیسی
Patients with the lysosomal disorder Gaucher disease (GD) are at risk of osteoporosis and/or avascular necrosis, but to date, no adequate biomarkers are available to ascertain individual predilections. Bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has traditionally been used to monitor trends. With the availability of a speed-of-sound (SOS) ultrasonography to assess bone strength/elasticity, we aimed to ascertain whether these modalities are complimentary or comparable so SOS, with no radiation risk, might be used more routinely as a potential biomarker. A prospective comparative study in adult GD patients undergoing routine follow-up of bone mineral density T- and Z-scores at forearm (FA), femoral neck, and lumbar spine, and SOS Z-scores at FA was initiated. Interpretation was by qualitative categorization of Z-scores. The kappa measure of agreement beyond chance was calculated between pairs of measurements and the McNemar test was then applied. This noninterventional trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02067247) was approved by the institutional ethics committee. There were 89 patients (ages 21-78 years, 61% female, 62% common Ashkenazi genotype, 18% splenectomized, and 18% with avascular necrosis/fractures). When comparing Z-scores at FA by DXA and SOS, only 39.3% correlated, while the remaining results were in disagreement; no trend was noted. Similarly, when comparing Z-scores at the femoral neck by DXA with those at FA by SOS, 44.9% of the results were in agreement; no trend was noted; and Z-scores at the lumbar spine by DXA with FA by SOS, 46% were in agreement and no trend was noted. DXA at the 3 sites did not track in the same direction or the same magnitude of difference with SOS at FA in adult patients with GD. Due to the fundamental differences between the 2 measurements and their clinical correlates, plus the lack of long-term follow-up to assess outcome, the potential added value of the measurements at the FA by SOS in patients with GD awaits further studies.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Clinical Densitometry - Volume 19, Issue 4, October 2016, Pages 465-470
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,