کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
88187 | 159288 | 2011 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Removing an exotic shrub from riparian forests increases butterfly abundance and diversity Removing an exotic shrub from riparian forests increases butterfly abundance and diversity](/preview/png/88187.png)
Invasive plants are one of the greatest threats to endangered insect species and a major threat to Lepidoptera in eastern North America. We investigated the effects of the invasive shrub Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and two methods (mulching or hand-felling) of removing it from riparian forests on butterfly communities and compared them to untreated, heavily invaded control plots and to “desired future condition” forests that never had extensive privet cover. Privet mulching resulted in nearly twice as many butterflies as privet felling and both treatments had more butterflies two years after privet removal than untreated control plots. Butterfly communities on control plots differed from those on the two treatments and the desired future condition forests. A number of forest characteristics were evaluated but only herbaceous plant cover (excluding privet) was positively correlated with butterfly abundance, diversity and evenness. The Carolina satyr, Hermeuptychia sosybius, was the best indicator of forests where privet had never invaded. Removing Chinese privet from riparian forests in the southeastern United States greatly improved forest habitats for butterflies and evidence suggests that butterfly communities in other temperate forests could benefit from removal of extensive shrub layers dominated by a single species.
► Butterflies are considered the “flagship taxa” for insect conservation.
► We removed the invasive shrub, Chinese privet, from riparian forests.
► Butterflies abundance increased dramatically following privet removal.
► Butterfly richness also improved.
► Butterfly communities in forests where privet was removed were not the same as uninvaded forests.
Journal: Forest Ecology and Management - Volume 262, Issue 4, 15 August 2011, Pages 674–680