کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
304727 | 512823 | 2012 | 14 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

This work aims at improving and validating methods coupling Finite Element (FE) and Boundary Element (BE) Methods in the context of Soil–Structure Interaction (SSI) and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction (3SI) tests performed by NUPEC on mock-up structures built on an unmade ground. Several cases have been tested: single and juxtaposed buildings, shallow and embedded foundations, with various loading conditions: forced and natural seismic loadings. The numerical simulations of forced vibration tests are in good agreement with the results of the NUPEC experiments in the case of two embedded buildings either in terms of amplitude and resonance. The numerical simulation of seismic response tests by FEM and BEM allows for a proper choice of the “reference point” where the computed and the experimental displacements coincide. A parametric analysis of Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction carried out by the FEM has allowed to determine the influence of some parameters on SSI. Most of them like the position of the building in the excavation, the direction of the load, the quality of the contact between the sidewalls of the buildings and the soil for embedded foundations, do not show to have a strong influence on the dynamic system behaviour, which is mainly governed by the stiffness of the first soil layer. As far as 3SI is concerned, this paper shows that when the cross interaction has a small effect on the building response in the case of surface foundations, it has a strong influence in the case of embedded foundations with an important decrease of the response at the top of the buildings.
► Validation of Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction models against NUPEC experimental database.
► Comparison between FEM and BEM models.
► Sensibility analysis on soil properties, location of nearby buildings and contact conditions for forced vibration tests.
► Analysis of the influence of the reference point on the seismic response.
Journal: Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering - Volume 32, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 129–142