کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3205644 1587555 2013 19 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Treatments for classic Kaposi sarcoma: A systematic review of the literature
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی امراض پوستی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Treatments for classic Kaposi sarcoma: A systematic review of the literature
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundTreatment guidelines are lacking for classic Kaposi sarcoma.ObjectiveWe sought to review the evidence on efficacy of treatments for classic Kaposi sarcoma.MethodsArticles published in English or French in MEDLINE, Trip, Cochrane Library, and Pascal databases from 1980 to December 2010 were screened. Studies reporting at least 5 patients treated for histologically confirmed classic Kaposi sarcoma were selected. Primary outcome was a decrease in the number or size of lesions or of lymphedema. We reviewed 26 articles matching the inclusion criteria for methodologic quality, classifying them according to World Health Organization criteria.ResultsThe percentage of patients with a 50% or greater decrease in lesions was 71% to 100% for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, 58% to 90% for vinca-alkaloids, 74% to 76% for etoposide, 93% to 100% for taxanes, 100% for gemcitabine, 97% for the combination of vinblastine and bleomycin, 71% to 100% for interferon alfa-2, 43% for thalidomide, and 12% for indinavir. For local treatments, a decrease of 50% or greater was achieved in 62% of lesions for intralesional vincristine, 50% to 90% for intralesional interferon alfa-2, 56% for imiquimod, and 25% for nicotine patches. A complete response was attained in 60% to 93% of lesions with radiotherapy.LimitationsEligible trials were of poor quality. The lack of standardized classification of disease activity and clinical outcomes precluded the comparison of studies.ConclusionThe evidence for efficacy of any particular intervention is of low quality and does not support recommending any particular therapeutic strategy. Further studies are required and it will be important to standardize the assessment of disease activity and clinical response.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology - Volume 68, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages 313–331
نویسندگان
, , ,