کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3210899 1587670 2006 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: A prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی امراض پوستی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: A prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundLocal anesthetics are acidic and cause pain on infiltration into the skin. Two methods are commonly used by dermatologists to raise the pH of lidocaine with epinephrine: buffering with sodium bicarbonate or freshly mixing lidocaine with epinephrine on the day of use.ObjectiveOur purpose was to compare the pain induced by infiltration of the skin with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buffered with sodium bicarbonate (buffered) versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine (fresh).MethodsSixty volunteers were recruited for this prospective, double-blind study. Each subject received an intradermal injection of the buffered solution and the fresh solution. Immediately after each injection subjects rated the pain of infiltration on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The pain scores for the anesthetic solutions were compared using the paired t test.ResultsThe pain score for the buffered solution was 18.3 ± 20.3, and the pain score for the fresh solution was 23.5 ± 19.1 (P = .0543). Sixty-five percent of subjects felt the fresh solution was more painful than the buffered solution.LimitationsThe results did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionIn this small study, buffered lidocaine with epinephine caused less pain on infiltration into the skin than lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine, but the results were not statistically significant.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology - Volume 54, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 128–131
نویسندگان
, , , , ,