External sulphur in IOCG mineralization: Implications on definition and classification of the IOCG clan

Although the sources of the ore metals remain problematic in most Iron-oxide Cu and Au (IOCG) deposits, external sulphur, either from surficial basinal brines and seawater (e.g., Central Andean and Carajás deposits) or from formation water and metamorphic fluids (e.g., the Cloncurry deposits), or introduced by magmatic assimilation of metasedimentary units (e.g., Phalaborwa), has been documented in many major Cu-rich IOCG centres. However, only the evaporite-sourced fluids yield diagnostically high δ34S values (i.e., > 10‰), while sedimentary formation water or metamorphic fluids commonly have lower values and are less clearly distinguishable from magmatic fluids, as in the Cloncurry deposits in which the involvement of external fluids is revealed by other evidence, such as noble gas isotopes. On the basis of these arguments, IOCG deposits could be redefined as a clan of Cu (AuAgU) deposits containing abundant hypogene iron oxide (magnetite and/or hematite), in which externally-derived sulphur probably plays an important role for the Cu (AuAgU) mineralization. In this definition, all “Kiruna-type” magnetite deposits, hydrothermal iron deposits (e.g., skarn Fe deposits) and magnetite-rich porphyry CuAu and skarn CuAu deposits are excluded. Two subtypes of IOCG deposits are recognized on the basis of the predominant iron oxide directly associated with the Cu (Au) mineralization, whether magnetite or hematite. Neither magnetite- nor hematite-rich IOCG deposits show any preference for specific host rocks, and both range in age from Neoarchean to Pleistocene, within a broad tectonic environment.

► Controversial IOCG model
► Essential external sulphur
► Definition-classification modified