کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4714693 | 1638360 | 2013 | 22 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Signs of magma ascent in LP and VLP seismic events and link to degassing: An example from the 2010 explosive eruption at Merapi volcano, Indonesia Signs of magma ascent in LP and VLP seismic events and link to degassing: An example from the 2010 explosive eruption at Merapi volcano, Indonesia](/preview/png/4714693.png)
• We analyze Long-Period seismic events during the 2010 Merapi eruption.
• We proceed to moment tensor inversion of a Very Long Period earthquake on 17/10.
• We show that LP seismic events cluster in space and time and are found to migrate toward summit as eruption progresses.
• We compare SO2 fluxes, RSAM data and main frequency of the LP earthquakes.
• We provide further evidence that Merapi volcano is subject to dynamic triggering.
The link between seismicity and degassing is investigated during the VEI 4 eruptions of Merapi volcano (Indonesia) in October and in early November 2010. Seismicity comprised a large number and variety of earthquakes including Volcano-Tectonic events, a sustained period of Long Period Seismicity (LPS), i.e., Long-Period events (LP), Very Long Period events (VLP) and tremor. LPS seismicity is ascribed to the excitation of fluid-filled cavity resonance and inertial displacement of fluids and magma. We investigate here LPS that occurred between 17 October and 4 November 2010 to obtain insights into the volcano eruption processes which preceded the paroxysmal phase of the eruption on 4–5 November. We proceed to the moment tensor inversion of a well-recorded large VLP event during the intrusion phase on 17 October 2010, i.e., before the first explosion on 26 October. By using two simplified models (crack and pipe), we find a shallow source for this VLP event at about 1 km to the south of the summit and less than 1 km below the surface. We analyze more than 90 LP events that occurred during the multi-phase eruption (29 October–4 November). We show that most of them have a dominant frequency in the range 0.2–4 Hz. We could locate 48 of those LP events; at least 3 clusters of LP events occurred successively. We interpret these observations as generated by different fluid-filled containers in the summit area that were excited while magma rose. We also observe significant variations of the complex frequency during the course of the eruption. We discuss these changes in terms of a variable ratio of fluid to solid densities and/or by possible conduit geometry change and/or permeability of the conduit or the edifice and/or by resonance of different fluid-containers during the release of more than 0.4 Tg of SO2 and large but unknown masses of other volcanic gases. Finally, we also discuss how the major explosions of the eruption were possibly triggered by passing waves resulting from regional tectonic earthquakes on 3 and 4 November.
Journal: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research - Volume 261, 1 July 2013, Pages 171–192