Comparison of performance of concrete barriers in a clayey geological medium

Cement based materials play an important role in the design and performance of future deep radioactive waste disposals. The type of materials selected for engineered barrier systems (EBS) is an important issue: protection of waste packages against corrosion and chemical degradation may be greatly enhanced by a proper choice and dimensioning. The long-term geochemical performance of two concrete types, CEM-I (pure Portland cement) and CEM-V (blended Portland, fly ash, blast furnace slag cement) was evaluated using reactive transport simulations of the interactions between the Callovo-Oxfordian mudrock (argillite) and concrete EBS over periods up to 106 years at 25 °C. Simulations have been run with cylindrical geometry using the modeling tool Hytec 3.5 (ENSMP/CIG). Diffusion of solutes in the porewater of the solid media was considered to be the dominant transport process. Different scenarios were studied, including the case of sulfate attack. Various assumptions on the transport properties of the EBS and the argillite medium have been considered and compared.The interactions between concrete, CEM-I or CEM-V, and mudrock are in both cases predicted to lead to a significant clogging in the mudrock, in the vicinity of the interface with the concrete EBS. However, the nature and extent of the EBS/mudrock interface transformations greatly differ for the two materials considered. CEM-V, due to lower diffusion coefficients, keeps longer internal high pH conditions which are favorable to the waste packages from a chemical point of view. In addition, simulations predict that CEM-V material should have a better resistance to sulfate attack than CEM-I based barriers.In the case of CEM-I, the altered clay zone has a greater extent (up to 1.3 m in 400,000 y) and the drop of porosity is mainly due to zeolites and reprecipitated illite, quartz and calcite. For CEM-V, the altered clay zone is much smaller (less than 0.2 m in 400,000 y) and secondary smectite and calcite precipitation are predicted to cause porosity reduction.