کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
8095729 | 1522065 | 2018 | 29 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Life-cycle assessment for coal-based methanol production in China
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی چرخه عمر تولید متانول بر اساس ذغال سنگ در چین
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
LCIFAETPTETPPOCPCGTOLDADPDALYCoGCCTGWPODP - RIPLife-cycle assessment - ارزیابی چرخه حیاتLCA - ارزیابی چرخه حیاتLife-cycle assessment (LCA) - ارزیابی چرخه زندگی (LCA)Land conversion - تبدیل زمینOzone layer depletion - تخریب لایه اوزونClimate change - تغییرات آب و هواEco-toxicity - زیست محیطیHuman health - سلامتی انسانLife-cycle inventory - موجودی چرخه زندگیdisability adjusted life years - ناتوانی سالهای زندگی تنظیم شده استAcidification Potential - پتانسیل اسیدی شدنPhotochemical Ozone Creation Potential - پتانسیل ایجاد اوزون PhotochemicalOzone layer Depletion Potential - پتانسیل تخریب لایه اوزونglobal warming potential - پتانسیل گرمایش جهانیEutrophication potential - پتانسیل یوتروفیزیکیAbiotic Depletion Potential - پدیده تخریب ابیوتیکRadiation - پرتوPdf - پی دی افChina - کشور چینEcosystem quality - کیفیت اکوسیستمcoke oven gas - گاز کوره کوره
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
مهندسی انرژی
انرژی های تجدید پذیر، توسعه پایدار و محیط زیست
چکیده انگلیسی
More methanol is produced and used in China than in any other country. China has a great deal of coal, less oil, and little gas, so the Chinese government is enthusiastically developing the coal-based chemical industry, of which coal-based methanol production is an important part. Coal-based methanol production strongly affects the environment, so the environmental impacts of coal-based methanol production processes must be assessed. Here, two life-cycle assessment models are established using GaBi6 software, and the models and local data for coal-based methanol production are used to establish a life-cycle inventory. The environmental impacts of two typical coal-based methanol production techniques are evaluated using the CML 2001 (mid-point level) method and the Eco-indicator 99 (end-point level) models. The results indicated that less environment harm is caused by producing methanol using the coal coking technology than by producing methanol using the coal gasification technology, especially in terms of acidification, global warming, and photochemical oxidation. In particular, significantly less environmental harm in terms of climate change and radiation is caused by the coal coking technology than by the coal gasification technology. Different sub-processes clearly make different contributions to environmental harm. The results indicated that the methanol production process, heating, and desalination are the main sources of environmental harm for both the coal gasification technology and coal coking technology. Importantly, the public engineering process rather than the methanol production process itself was found to determine emissions for the different methanol production methods.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Cleaner Production - Volume 188, 1 July 2018, Pages 1004-1017
Journal: Journal of Cleaner Production - Volume 188, 1 July 2018, Pages 1004-1017
نویسندگان
Changhang Li, Hongtao Bai, Yuanye Lu, Jinghong Bian, Yan Dong, He Xu,