SWAT model uncertainty analysis, calibration and validation for runoff simulation in the Luvuvhu River catchment, South Africa

The soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) was calibrated for the Luvuvhu River catchment, South Africa in order to simulate runoff. The model was executed through QSWAT which is an interface between SWAT and QGIS. Data from four weather stations and four weir stations evenly distributed over the catchment were used. The model was run for a 33-year period of 1983-2015. Sensitivity analysis, calibration and validation were conducted using the sequential uncertainty fitting (SUFI-2) algorithm through its interface with SWAT calibration and uncertainty procedure (SWAT-CUP). The calibration process was conducted for the period 1986 to 2005 while the validation process was from 2006 to 2015. Six model efficiency measures were used, namely: coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) index, root mean square error (RMSE)-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR), percent bias (PBIAS), probability (P)-factor and correlation coefficient (R)-factor were used. Initial results indicated an over-estimation of low flows with regression slope of less than 0.7. Twelve model parameters were applied for sensitivity analysis with four (ALPHA_BF, CN2, GW_DELAY and SOL_K) found to be more distinguishable and sensitive to streamflow (p < 0.05). The SUFI-2 algorithm through the interface with the SWAT-CUP was capable of capturing the model's behaviour, with calibration results showing an R2 of 0.63, NSE index of 0.66, RSR of 0.56 and a positive PBIAS of 16.3 while validation results revealed an R2 of 0.52, NSE of 0.48, RSR of 0.72 and PBIAS of 19.90. The model produced P-factor of 0.67 and R-factor of 0.68 during calibration and during validation, 0.69 and 0.53 respectively. Although performance indicators yielded fair and acceptable results, the P-factor was still below the recommended model performance of 70%. Apart from the unacceptable P-factor values, the results obtained in this study demonstrate acceptable model performance during calibration while validation results were still inconclusive. It can be concluded that calibration of the SWAT model yielded acceptable results with exception to validation results. Having said this, the model can be a useful tool for general water resources assessment and not for analysing hydrological extremes in the Luvuvhu River catchment.