کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
8959604 | 1646332 | 2018 | 15 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comment on “Ichnological analysis of contourites: Past, present and future” by Francisco J. RodrÃguez-Tovar and F. Javier Hernández-Molina [Earth-Science Reviews, 182 (2018), 28-41]
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
علوم زمین و سیارات
زمین شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
By their impressive paper title “Ichnological analysis of contourites: Past, present and future”, RodrÃguez-Tovar and Hernández-Molina (2018) have implied that the paper is about a comprehensive review of the topic in space (i.e., global) and time (i.e., past, present, and future). But in reality, the paper has covered only three case studies in Europe. In the real world, bioturbation and burrows are not unique to contourites; they are equally abundant in turbidites, hyperpycnites, tempestites, and even in deformed seismites. Therefore, the immediate challenge is in distinguishing contourite facies from other facies (e.g. hyperpycnites with intense bioturbation). Disappointingly, the review has neglected to address this fundamental issue. Without resolving the basic issue of distinguishing contourites, any ichnological analysis of “contourites” is purely academic and has no relevance in advancing contourite research.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Earth-Science Reviews - Volume 184, September 2018, Pages 46-49
Journal: Earth-Science Reviews - Volume 184, September 2018, Pages 46-49
نویسندگان
G. Shanmugam,