کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
360615 | 1436007 | 2016 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We extend a discussion on how knowledge of advanced mathematics (or lack of it) can guide instructional interaction.
• We investigate how prospective teachers explain the use of the symbol superscript (−1) for inverse of a function and a reciprocal of a fraction.
• We demonstrate the applicability of scripting tasks for exploring mathematical knowledge and pedagogical choices.
In mathematics the same symbol – superscript (−1) – is used to indicate an inverse of a function and a reciprocal of a rational number. Is there a reason for using the same symbol in both cases? We analyze the responses of prospective secondary school teachers to this question. The responses are presented in a form of a dialogue between a teacher and a student and are accompanied with participants’ commentary on their choices of instructional approaches. The data show that the majority of participants treat the symbol ☐−1 as a homonym, that is, the symbol is assigned different and unrelated meanings depending on a context. We discuss how knowledge of advanced mathematics (or lack of it) can guide instructional interaction.
Journal: The Journal of Mathematical Behavior - Volume 43, September 2016, Pages 98–110