کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
360630 | 1436009 | 2016 | 19 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Mathematical detailing in young children's mathematical argumentative writing (grades K-3) was examined.
• Detailing is characterized by how mathematical information is referenced.
• Increased complexity of given information for a task may improve the likelihood children will operationalize givens in their argumentative writing.
The nature of mathematical argumentative writing (MAW) is relatively understudied, particularly in the context of early childhood. While much of the literature on MAW, and mathematical argumentation in general, has focused on the manner in which procedures and warrants are sequenced, the present study focused on the grammatical resource of mathematical detailing. Mathematical detailing involves the linguistic operationalization of given information within and across the sequencing of warrants to support a mathematical claim. The present study examined the effect of varying the complexity of the given information in two similar tasks on how children used given information in their mathematical writing. Findings indicate that increasing the complexity of the givens can encourage many children to operationalize the given information, as well as provide insight into children's communicated conceptions of the mathematics at hand.
Journal: The Journal of Mathematical Behavior - Volume 41, March 2016, Pages 68–86