کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4723451 | 1639651 | 2012 | 25 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Episodic mantle melting-crustal reworking in the late Neoarchean of the northwestern North China Craton: Zircon ages of magmatic and metamorphic rocks from the Yinshan Block Episodic mantle melting-crustal reworking in the late Neoarchean of the northwestern North China Craton: Zircon ages of magmatic and metamorphic rocks from the Yinshan Block](/preview/png/4723451.png)
The Yinshan Block in the northwestern North China Craton comprises late Neoarchean greenstones, high-grade metamorphic rocks (granulite, charnockite, enderbite and amphibole gneiss), diorites (sanukitoid and Mg-adakite) and granitoids (predominantly trondhjemite-tonalite). A greenstone terrane comprises a volcanic sequence of predominant basalt and dacite, with minor andesite. Zircons from a high-Mg andesite and an andesite have weighted mean 207Pb/206Pb ages of 2533 ± 5 Ma and 2510 ± 7 Ma, respectively, which reflect the timing of two distinct volcanic episodes. These two either predated or postdated a major volcanic episode that formed a basalt-dacite bimodal suite during 2515 ± 10 (basalt) to 2516 ± 10 Ma (dacite). Magmatic zircons from the high-grade metamorphic rocks yielded weighted mean 207Pb/206Pb ages of 2544 ± 5 Ma for a mafic granulite, 2521 ± 6 Ma for a garnetiferous gneiss, 2535 ± 5 Ma for a charnockite, and 2526 ± 5 Ma for an amphibole gneiss. These ages reflect the (minimum) emplacement time of rocks that make up the protoliths of the high-grade metamorphic complex. The metamorphic ages of the high-grade complex were determined at 2515 ± 18 Ma for mafic granulite and 2503 ± 12 Ma for garnetiferous gneiss. Zircons from a high-Mg diorite (i.e. sanukitoid) have a weighted mean age of 2520 ± 6 Ma, which is significantly younger than the 2556 ± 14 Ma age of a magnesian diorite (Mg-adakite) from the same diorite massif. These ages reflect distinctive magmatic pulses that generated the diorite massif. A tonalite has a zircon age of 2516 ± 7 Ma, indistinguishable from the 2520 ± 9 Ma age of a trondhjemite from the same trondhjemite/tonalite-dominated batholith. A granitic compositional layer in the 2516 ± 7 Ma tonalite has zircon ages of 2515 ± 6 Ma (high-U zircon domains) and 2512 ± 22 Ma (low-U zircon domains), which reflect an intracrustal melting event. The presence of an older crustal remnant (ca. >2600 Ma) prior to the formation of the Yinshan Block is indicated by a 2594 ± 4 Ma leucogranite xenolith in the diorite massif and by the widespread presence of ca. 2583–3485 Ma (mostly, ca. 2700 Ma) zircon xenocrysts in a variety of volcanic and plutonic rocks. An undeformed pegmatite dike in high-Mg andesite has an emplacement age of 2508 ± 17 Ma (zircon). An undeformed trondhjemite dike that cuts the supracrustal greenstone sequence yielded a zircon age of 2502 ± 6 Ma, similar to that of the pegmatite dike, and representing the latest Archean magmatic event in the Yinshan Block. These ages of undeformed granitoid dikes delimit the termination of thermo-tectonic development of the Yinshan Block. Based on these new ages and published geological and geochronological data, we conclude that the Yinshan Block is a typical Neoarchean cratonic block, not a segment of the so-called “Paleoproterozoic Inner Mongolia-North Hebei Orogen”. Episodic mantle melting and resultant crustal reworking account for the thermo-tectonic development of the Yinshan Block in a brief period (ca. 2556–2502 Ma) in the late Neoarchean, and based on their regional chronological correlations we argue for their craton-scale significance.
Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► Late Neoarchean zircon ages characterize the Yinshan Block, North China Craton.
► We established a timescale for thermo-tectonic development of the Yinshan Block.
► Episodic mantle-melting/crustal-reworking explains the development of Yinshan Block.
► We discuss craton-scale chronological correlations in the late Neoarchean.
Journal: Precambrian Research - Volumes 222–223, December 2012, Pages 230–254