کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5857359 | 1132000 | 2014 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparative analysis of toxicological evaluations for dermal exposure performed under two different EU regulatory frameworks
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تجزیه و تحلیل مقایسهای ارزیابی سمیتهای پوستی تحت دو چارچوب قانونی اتحادیه اروپا انجام شده است
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
ECHANOAELDNELLOAELSCCsMOSEuropean Chemicals Agency - آژانس مواد شیمیایی اروپاregistration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals - ثبت نام، ارزیابی، مجوز و محدودیت مواد شیمیاییMargin of safety - حاشیه ایمنیlethal dose - دوز مرگبارREACH - رسیدنDerived No Effect Level - سطح متوالی بدون اثرRisk management - مدیریت ریسکRegulation - مقرراتNo observed adverse effect level - هیچ عوارض جانبی مشاهده نشدهLowest observed adverse effect level - کمترین میزان بروز ناخواسته مشاهده شدهScientific Committee on Consumer Safety - کمیته علمی ایمنی مصرف کننده
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علوم محیط زیست
بهداشت، سم شناسی و جهش زایی
چکیده انگلیسی
Dermal exposure to chemicals is highly relevant in relation to the use of cosmetic products, both in consumers and in individuals exposed occupationally. Regulatory frameworks exist within the EU to limit the dermal exposure of the general population and workers to chemicals in general, as well as to limit the use of certain substances in cosmetic products. The objective of the study was to investigate and compare toxicological evaluations of dermal exposure performed under current regulatory frameworks. The publicly disseminated hazard information under the respective regulatory frameworks was compiled and compared for the five substances resorcinol, p-phenylenediamine, p-aminophenol, N-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine, and diethylene glycol monoethyl ether. A low consistency between evaluations was observed in respect to data coverage and cited dose descriptors. No systematic differences over all five substances were identified from the viewpoint of dermal hazard assessment. The critical effect and corresponding systemic effect dose descriptor was identical for two substances, differed somewhat for two other (a factor of 2-2.5). For N-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine a critical effect was only identified under REACH.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology - Volume 68, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages 51-58
Journal: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology - Volume 68, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages 51-58
نویسندگان
Emma Westerholm, Linda Schenk,